(Below, find a resurrection simulation video.)
Are You Prepared for Heaven?
Some personal characteristics that impact our rewards in eternity include our love, happiness, joy, testimony, kindness, guidance, relationships, hospitality, gladness, priorities, frustration, friendship, free will, peace, praise, thankfulness, music, brightness, bliss, color, comfort, prayer, and worship. Are you ready for eternity? Will you participate in the resurrection to life? Is the Shroud of Turin evidence of a resurrected body? Jesus is in heaven. His body is not here (John 20:17).
Is the Shroud of Turin Real?
Some questions stay with us for a lifetime. At times, they gently resurface, inviting us to pause and reflect more deeply on life. Questions about death, the meaning of our life on earth, and what lies beyond this life have been part of the human story from the beginning. Science helps us understand much about the world around us, but it has limits when we begin to ask questions about eternity (1 Corinthians 13:12).
It is in this space—where faith, reason, history, and mystery meet—that the Shroud of Turin continues to draw interest. Whether viewed as a sacred relic, a historical object, or an unsolved mystery, the Shroud encourages thoughtful reflection—not only about how an image appeared on cloth, but about what resurrection itself might mean (Wilson, 2010; Schwortz, 2012).
Eternity and the Impact of Human Life
There are many things in this world that make us wonder, but the afterlife may be the most important of all. Scripture teaches that our lives matter beyond what we can see today, reminding us that “So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God” (Romans 14:12).
Our choices, words, and actions carry lasting meaning. They reveal what we value and whom we serve, including the words we sometimes wish we had chosen more carefully, spoken only moments earlier.
Because heaven and hell are real, it is wise to consider the direction of our lives and the condition of our hearts. Jesus spoke openly about eternal outcomes, saying “And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal” (Matthew 25:46). At the same time, Scripture reveals God’s patient and merciful heart “The Lord is not slack concerning his promise… but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish” (2 Peter 3:9).
The Shroud of Turin and the Question of Identity
The Shroud of Turin presents physical evidence of the death of a man who closely resembles the biblical description of Jesus Christ. While no absolute proof exists, the details found on the cloth naturally raise thoughtful questions. The image shows wounds consistent with crucifixion, aligning with Scripture, which says “They pierced my hands and my feet” (Psalm 22:16).
After His resurrection, Jesus invited His followers to examine Him closely, saying “Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself” (Luke 24:39). If those who loved Jesus had access to His burial cloth after He rose, it would make sense that they would preserve it with care (Wilson, 2010).
Scientific Observation and Human Limitation
Over the years, the Shroud has been studied by historians, scientists, and more recently, artificial intelligence. Some researchers point to the image’s unusual characteristics—its shallow depth, lack of pigment, and biological traces—as reasons it remains difficult to explain (Heller & Adler, 1981; Jumper et al., 1984; Rogers, 2008). Others rightly caution that contamination, interpretation, and technological limits must be considered.
Scripture reminds us of our limited understanding, for “For now we see through a glass, darkly” (1 Corinthians 13:12).
Shroud of Turin: Observations and Findings (with sources inserted)
The Bible does not mention an image on the burial cloth used to wrap Jesus (John 19:40; John 20:6–7).
The weave of the standard linen of the day indicates intrinsic value and consistency with expensive fabric prevalent in the first century (Fanti et al., 2010; Shroud of Turin Information, n.d.-a).
The shroud itself survived a fire in 1532. It was in a silver case for storage which melted and damaged it. It has water stains as well (Santa Sindone, n.d.; Wikipedia, n.d.-a; Heller & Adler, 1981; Othonia, n.d.-a).
Evidence of microscopic limestone dirt has a chemical signature consistent with those found in arid mediterranean areas such as the middle east or even Jerusalem. There is evidence of this dirt on the tip of the nose, the knees, and the bottoms of the feet (FactsPlusFacts, n.d.; Medieval Shroud, 2021; Shroud of Turin Information, n.d.-a).
However, the actual image resides only on the very edge or within the first or second microfibers of the surface of the cloth. If each thread contains between one and two hundred microfibers, the image rests on less than one percent of any single thread (Fanti et al., 2010; Shroud3D, n.d.; Rucker, 2023).
Only a negative photograhic image of the shroud allows visual access to intense details such as the left hand resting on top of the right while covering the groin area (Wikipedia, n.d.-b; Kent, 2014).
The blood stain itself is the positive visible image (Heller & Adler, 1981; Othonia, n.d.-a).
The blood stain indicating “pierced on his side” is on the right side of the actual body but looking at it from a viewer’s perpective presents it on the left in the image (John 19:34; Benford, 1997).
Scientific scrutiny reveals the absence of paint, dyes, or stains other than the blood stains to indicate the form of the body (Heller & Adler, 1981; Heimburger, 2008).
No side or top views are available considering that the cloth was a covering underneath and above the body, likely not a wrap on the sides (Wikipedia, n.d.-b; Shroud3D, n.d.).
However, the covering wraps around the bottom of the feet as it extends from the top to the bottom of the body, indicated by two distinct wounds on the bottom the left foot (Paleotto, 1598/1993; Shroud of Turin Information, n.d.-b).
The image is presumed to be “discoloration” based on “dehydration” (Heller & Adler, 1981; Heimburger, 2008).
The process that causes carbon atoms to move from a “single covalent bond to a double covalent bond” accounts for the formation of the stain itself. This is actually a change in the “arrangement of the electrons in the outer atom” ring of the cellulose molecules (Grasso, n.d.-a; Othonia, 2025).
According to researchers, no substance (or atoms) was actually added to the cloth to create the image but instead, the image is a reaction some type of exposure causing a chemical change (Heller & Adler, 1981; Heimburger, 2008).
It appears to present a swollen right cheek and possible broken nose. The impressions on the back of the body show hundreds of lash wounds (Shroud3D, n.d.; Kent, 2014; Othonia, 2024).
Resurrection as Transformation
The Shroud shows wounds to the wrists, side, and feet—injuries consistent with crucifixion (Wilson, 2010; Whanger, 1998). While such wounds could be recreated, the image itself remains unusual. It appears to affect only the outermost fibers of the cloth and does not behave like paint or dye (Schwortz, 2012; Heller & Adler, 1981; Heimburger, 2008). Jesus spoke of His body being raised, declaring “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19).
This distinction matters because near-death experiences often describe the soul leaving the body while the body remains unchanged. Scripture describes something far greater in Christ’s resurrection. Jesus confirmed this reality when He said “Handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have” (Luke 24:39). The Bible also promises a future resurrection for believers “The dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed” (1 Corinthians 15:52). “Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body” (Philippians 3:21).
Discernment and Interpretation
Modern documentaries and AI studies have claimed to identify patterns or shapes within the image. Critics rightly note that both people and machines are skilled at finding patterns. Scripture provides wise guidance in such matters, instructing believers to “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21).
A Call to Life Change in Light of Eternity
Scripture teaches that life should be lived with eternity in view. These truths are not meant merely to inform but to transform. Believers are called to holiness, as God commands “Be ye holy; for I am holy” (1 Peter 1:16).
This call flows from God’s love, for “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son” (John 3:16). Yet Scripture also speaks honestly about the danger of rejecting saving faith, warning that “He that believeth not is condemned already” (John 3:18).
We do not place our trust in relics, but in Scripture. The Shroud, if considered at all, serves only as a reminder that death is not the end. The Bible is clear: Christ rose bodily, judgment is real, salvation is offered, and eternal life is promised.
Eternity is near for all of us. True wisdom is living now in light of eternity—turning from sin, loving others as God loves them, and responding to the saving faith God offers today. Life in the love of Christ moment by moment, daily.
Scientific A.I. Summation
(Bayesian-Neutral)
The Shroud image displays several well-documented physical characteristics: life-size front and back body images, true negative behavior, three-dimensional shading correlated with cloth-to-body distance, absence of ultraviolet fluorescence in the body image, and micron-scale discoloration confined to the outermost fibrils of the linen fibers without penetration into the fiber cores (Jackson et al., 1984; Schwalbe & Rogers, 1982; Miller & Pellicori, 1981; Rogers, 2005). No medieval or modern image-formation method has been demonstrated to reproduce all of these properties together in a single, consistent process, although partial analogues exist (Garlaschelli, 2010).
The only direct chronological measurement performed on the cloth, the 1988 AMS radiocarbon dating, dated the tested linen samples to 1260–1390 AD; this method measures carbon content, not the mechanism or timing of image formation (Damon et al., 1989). Some researchers have proposed that the measured C-14 level could have been altered after manufacture, most notably through neutron absorption by nitrogen in the linen producing additional carbon-14 (N-14 + n → C-14 + p), but this hypothesis remains theoretical and unverified and is not part of standard radiocarbon methodology (Rogers, 2005; Rucker, n.d.).
Taken together, the evidence supports confidence in the radiocarbon age of the tested samples while also indicating that the image-formation mechanism remains unresolved. From a Bayesian perspective, hypotheses requiring unverified physical processes carry lower evidential weight, and the probability that the image was produced by a known medieval technique satisfying all observed physical constraints is best described as very low (expert judgment, well under 1%), while a medieval date for the tested linen cannot be ruled out pending new, independent measurements.
References
Adler, A. (1999). The nature of the body images on the Shroud of Turin. Shroud Spectrum International.
https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi43part3.pdf
Benford, S. (1997). Negativity and the Shroud. The Holy Shroud Guild Newsletter.
https://www.shroud.com/benford.htm
Damon, P. E., Donahue, D. J., Gore, B. H., Hatheway, A. L., Jull, A. J. T., Linick, T. W., … Toolin, L. J. (1989).
Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin. Nature, 337(6208), 611–615.
https://doi.org/10.1038/337611a0
FactsPlusFacts. (n.d.). Shroud of Turin: Travertine aragonite.
http://www.factsplusfacts.com/resources/Travertine.htm
Fanti, G., Botella, J. A., Di Lazzaro, P., Heimburger, T., Schneider, R., & Svensson, N. (2010).
Microscopic and macroscopic characteristics of the Shroud of Turin image superficiality.
Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 54(4), 040201.
https://library.imaging.org/admin/apis/public/api/ist/website/downloadArticle/jist/54/4/art00001
Garlaschelli, L. (2010).
Life-size reproduction of the Shroud of Turin and its image.
Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 54(4), 040301.
https://doi.org/10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2010.54.4.040301
Grasso, O. (n.d.).
Detailed coloration mechanism: Dehydration, oxidation, and conjugation in Shroud image formation.
https://www.academia.edu/143736508
Heimburger, T. (2008).
A detailed critical review of the chemical studies on the Turin Shroud: Facts and interpretations.
https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/thibault%20final%2001.pdf
Heller, J. H., & Adler, A. D. (1981).
A chemical investigation of the Shroud of Turin.
Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, 14(3), 81–103.
https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi43part3.pdf
Jackson, J. P., Jumper, E. J., & Ercoline, W. R. (1984).
Correlation of image intensity on the Turin Shroud with the three-dimensional structure of a human body shape.
Applied Optics, 23(14), 2244–2270.
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.002244
Kent, R. (2014, May 14).
Photography of the Shroud.
https://drrichardkent.org/shroud-of-turin/photography-of-the-shroud/
Medieval Shroud. (2021, April 24).
Limestone on the Shroud.
https://medievalshroud.com/limestone-on-the-shroud/
Miller, V. D., & Pellicori, S. F. (1981).
Ultraviolet fluorescence photography of the Shroud of Turin.
Journal of Biological Photography, 49(3), 71–85.
Othonia. (n.d.).
Markings on the Shroud.
https://othonia.org/exhibit/deep-dive/markings-on-the-shroud/
Othonia. (2024).
The forensics of crucifixion.
https://othonia.org/deep-dives-article/the-forensics-of-crucifixion/
Othonia. (2025, August 13).
The Shroud of Turin: An image that demands a response.
https://othonia.org/an-image-that-demands-a-response/
Paleotto, A. (1598/1993).
Considerations on the wounds of the Lord’s feet, as seen on the Holy Shroud.
Shroud Spectrum International, No. 9, Part 5.
https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi09part5.pdf
Rogers, R. N. (2005).
Studies on the radiocarbon sample from the Shroud of Turin.
Thermochimica Acta, 425(1–2), 189–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2004.09.029
Rucker, R. A. (2023, July 24; rev. 2024, October 17).
Hypothesis for image formation on the Shroud of Turin.
https://0201.nccdn.net/1_2/000/000/0cb/57d/hypothesis-for-image-formation-on-the-shroud-of-turin.pdf
Santa Sindone. (n.d.).
The fire.
https://sindone.org/en/home-english/the-shroud/the-fire/
Schwalbe, L. A., & Rogers, R. N. (1982).
Physics and chemistry of the Shroud of Turin.
Analytica Chimica Acta, 135, 3–49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)85384-5
Schwortz, B. (2012).
STURP’s conclusions.
https://www.shroud.com
Shroud of Turin Information. (n.d.-a).
Forensic evidence – textile evidence.
https://shroudofturin.uk/research-evidence/forensic-evidence
Shroud of Turin Information. (n.d.-b).
Wounds depicted.
https://shroudofturin.uk/research-evidence/forensic-evidence/injuries-depicted
Shroud3D. (n.d.).
Image qualities of the Shroud of Turin.
https://shroud3d.com/introduction/image-qualities-of-the-shroud-of-turin/
Wikipedia. (n.d.-a).
History of the Shroud of Turin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin
Wikipedia. (n.d.-b).
Shroud of Turin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin
Wilson, I. (2010).
The Shroud: Fresh light on the 2000-year-old mystery.
Bantam Press.
The Holy Bible (King James Version).
Passages cited: John 20:17; 1 Corinthians 13:12; Romans 14:12; Matthew 25:46; 2 Peter 3:9;
Psalm 22:16; Luke 24:39; John 19:34; John 2:19; 1 Thessalonians 5:21; 1 Peter 1:16;
John 3:16; John 3:18; 1 Corinthians 15:52; Philippians 3:21.